Why are the
world’s loudest ‘progressive’ voices silent on Iran?
Jake Wallis Simons
It is stunning
that the Left of today has still not learnt from the 1979 Islamic Revolution
The Iranian uprising is one of the three most moving
expressions of human defiance so far this century. If the regime is toppled, it
will constitute a fulcrum in the history of the world. Yet the hypocritical
response from the liberal establishment has been as nauseating
as it has been infuriating.
From Keir
Starmer to Gary
Lineker, a startling number of our loudest “human rights” voices seem
to be taking the words of the Persian mystic Rumi – “Out beyond ideas of
wrongdoing and rightdoing, there is a field. I’ll meet you there” – rather too
literally.
Surely, if there was ever a moment not to
go beyond “ideas of wrongdoing and rightdoing”, now would be the time. Yet in
addition to Starmer (a weakling statement with France and Germany, and
refusing to
proscribe the IRGC) and Lineker (silence), armies of Western notables are
either downplaying or simply ignoring this dramatic struggle for freedom.
These are the people that are passionate when their activism
harms the West, but whose voices seem to desert them when the tyrant wears a
turban. This is especially true of those who have built their politics on an
obsession with “Palestine”. Which, coincidentally enough, is something they
have in common with the Iranian regime.
Remember, for instance, the UN’s oily humanitarian chief,
Tom Fletcher? He
who falsely claimed that “14,000 babies” were facing starvation in
Gaza, and went on to post preening video selfies of himself bravely helping the
Palestinians? So far, as far as I can see, the chap has posted nothing on Iran.
Which, for the “under-secretary-general for humanitarian affairs”, is quite the
omission.
This wholesale depravity from those who signal their virtue
loudest is enough to make you vomit with rage. But it should hardly be a
surprise: the Left has form, especially when it comes to Iran.
Rewind to 1979 and progressive intellectuals were falling
over themselves to support the Ayatollah as he overthrew the Shah and seized
power.
Tehran, 1979: As many as 17 million people marched
peacefully to demand the removal of the Shah and the return of Ayatollah
Khomeini Credit: Kaveh Kazemi/Getty Images
Take the Leftist French philosopher and paedophile Michel
Foucault. In his sage opinion, the rise of the Ayatollah was an example of “spiritualité
politique” and a “great insurrection against global systems”.
Similarly, Edward Said, the father of “postcolonialism”,
justified the revolution as “a concrete response to the specific policy
injuring them as human beings” and criticised the Ayatollah’s Western
detractors for their Orientalist “caricatures” of the Islamist leader.
Between them, these two men – and others like them – are
responsible for all the anti-Western brain rot that intellectually cripples our
students today. Is it any wonder that the
United Arab Emirates is withdrawing its citizens from British
universities to protect them from radicalisation? Is it any surprise that we
have seen no campus encampments for the courageous people of Iran?
Here’s the truth: the Left loves nothing more than a
revolution, but only when it harms the West. In 1967, when the Shah visited
West Berlin, he was met with Leftist protests that quickly turned violent. This
contributed towards the radicalisation of German progressives – who allied with
Iranian revolutionaries to help them overthrow the Pahlavi dynasty – and the
subsequent emergence of the murderous Baader-Meinhof gang.
That’s not to say that the Shah was some kind of liberal
democrat. He was authoritarian, corrupt, extravagant and brutal. By comparison
with the theocracy that replaced him, however, he was practically a
humanitarian and had the advantage of greatly favouring the West.
As Ronald Reagan pointed out in 1984: “The Shah had done our
bidding and carried our load in the Middle East for quite some time, and I did
think that it was a blot on our record that we let him down,” especially since
that meant enabling the ambitions of the “maniacal fanatic” Khomeini.
It is stunning that the Left of today has still not learnt
from its mistakes. During the 1979 revolution that swept the Ayatollah to
power, Iranian communists, Marxist-Leninist guerrillas, Left-wing democrats and
students threw themselves against the Shah in a “strange union” with the
Islamists.
As soon as Khomeini became supreme leader, however, his
secular allies were systematically purged, criminalised, imprisoned, executed
and crushed.
Tehran, 1979: Ayatollah Khomeini speaks from a balcony in
Tehran Credit: Reuters
The lesson was clear: like the crocodile offering a ride
across a river, Islamists
will devour you once they’ve finished with you. It’s in their nature. Yet
here we are again, with progressives holding their tongues about tyranny
because their true animus is still reserved for capitalist democracy,
especially its outpost in the Middle East.
The hypocrisy could not be clearer. In the eyes of the Left,
human rights only matter when they can be used as a weapon against the West.
For the Islamists, it is a match made in heaven: from West Midlands Police to
our universities, from the UN to the streets of our cities on Saturdays, is it
any wonder that the jihadis are finding the job of manipulation so easy?
As I write, young Iranians are being gunned down by cowardly
jihadis who lust after the apocalypse. Already, the revolution has its icons:
the young man who attacked a motorcycle death squad with a homemade
flamethrower; the women who have been bravely photographed lighting their
cigarettes with pictures of the Ayatollah; the activist who tore down the
regime’s flag at the embassy in London on Saturday.
Tragically, it also has its martyrs. The 23-year-old Tehrani
student Rubina Aminian, who was shot in the back of the head and buried by the
roadside, is just one sickening example. Footage has revealed young women
peering out of prison vans as they are carted off to the dungeons. Distraught
parents have been filmed in morgues, searching for their children in the body
bags.
Along with the Israelis standing steadfast on the frontline
of jihad and the Ukrainians facing down Putin, these are the true heroes of our
time, not those craven, plastic hypocrites of the Left. The Persian protesters
are the true embodiment of the words of Rumi: “Dance in the middle of the
fighting. Dance in your blood. Dance when you’re perfectly free.” Viva
la revolución!

Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário